Attitudes of War in Ancient Civilizations Essay -- essays research pap

Chapter Eight War and Society reveals the attitudes about warfare in both(prenominal) ancient capital of Italy and China. These attitudes prove that in these cases perchance it is safe to say that wars are not inevitable or pictorial further were caused by warlike societies and social situations. by and by reading bits and pieces of both the ancient roman print and Chinese history, one jakes only bring forward a greater perspective on how these attitudes derived. In 391 nomads called the Gauls defeated a small army of Roman aristocrats and burnt down the town of Rome. After this flack, Rome rebuilt its town and changed it into an empire, which spread its laws, culture, and peace from the North. Rome was convinced that afterward this first invasion, it was necessary to change their military. Over age the Romans were able to bottle up most of Italy. As the Romans began to gain power and land, they set their eyes on larger obstacles. This is when Roman attitude was perhaps revealed about the subject of war. Romans believed that their magnification had been inevitable so they were to believe that they were blameless, and that their ancestors had been more than a passive cock of destiny. They believed that other areas, posed as possible threats and that it was necessary for defensive reasons to attack first. Today, these can be viewed as possibly preventive wars. But during the time of the expansion of the Roman Empire, a preventive war wasnt a concern. Other views were demonstrated in their boutions, that although at first Romans were unable to want Carthage, they kept trying, and over time, and most likely many deaths, the Roman soldiers wore them down. Rome was like a bulldozer and used their skilled military to their advantage, to engross over and destroy anything that it set its eyes on. Their actions, such as afterward completely destroying Carthage and massacring the majority of its population all because it posed as a potential economic t hreat to Roman land. These views or attitudes of war can be easily seen, war was not considered a preventive war, but a necessary war, although many times, it was cl proto(prenominal) unnecessary and the fall of the Roman Empire, eventually gave the Roman commanders what they deserved. On the flipside, ancient Chinese attitude toward war was quite similar to that of the Romans. Warfare in this society was common and accepted, the humor of honor also coincides with their attitude toward war. When ... ...e end. I believe that this nigh relates to the early context of Is the Glory of War a Boy Thing? Because I believe one can easily glorify both the leap of the empires as a courageous and powerful movement, rather then closely looking at the true outcome of these wars. A Pericles type of funeral discourse would curb possibly been effective in ancient Rome or China, because at the time both were such powerful empires, people would have easily been convinced to believe practically anything. How can one check it just, to kill practically a whole society because they pose as a possible threat to economy because they too, are growing grapes? Pericles states in his oration that the people under his society are the best, and that it was perfectly satisfying to dominate other areas. He also mentions ancestors, and the pride in Athens, so its important to praise and glorify those who died. Isnt it funny how history repeats itself? The Romans believed that because mat up threatened it was okay to dominate other lands, and their ancestors faced hardships with the nomads it was acceptable to do so in return. Or the Chinese, who believed that war a proper, powerful, and masculine act of man.