Epistemology and Skepticism Essay Example for Free

Epistemology and Skepticism examine* Epistemology and Skepticism How does The Matrix illustrate the challenge of skepticism about the external institution? Explain, discuss, and critically rate the hallucination channel for complete epistemological skepticism. Be sure your essay includes a discussion of either Hospers or Crumley IIs criticism of complete epistemological skepticism. Is complete epistemological skepticism a logically legitimate theory? Support your answer with a well-reasoned argument free of any major errors of fact, fallacy or logical contradiction. I. Introduction * The matrix questions the nature of substantiality. * How can we know for certain that the world is how we perceive it and non just a veil over our eyes? * Explain movie- trapped in virtual world believing they are in 21st century * Explanation proposes question, what is real? II. Main Points. * Main causa Morpheus What is real? How do you define real? If real is simply what you can feel, sme ll, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain. * Consequently, How can we be sure our brain isnt being tricked by some simulation to suppose things are real, when they arent?This is how matrix proposes the challenge of epistemological skepticism. * fallacy argument Modus Tollens, question soundness (valid) 1. If we posses knowledge (K) we moldiness be able to rule out the opening of systematic hallucination (S). K S 2. S (the matrix hypothesis. ) (MT 1) 3. K ( MT 1 2) * single arguer against skepticism John Hospers * Merely verbal * Skeptics take strong sense of the word knowledge, must have proof at all times * Others use weak sense, meaning we only requirement proof or evidence only when someone is proving otherwise. * Doubt is an empty word.* Basic point once a test has been done to remove doubt we have a good reason to believe it is true, thus we have knowledge. III. Conclusion * Skeptics believe knowledge is unobtainable, in this case the hallucination argument proves the premise are true through Modus Tollens. Although the argument is sound, it is self-defeating because skeptics believe they know that they dont very know anything. Moreover, complete epistemological skepticism is not a logically coherent view because the argument being claimed would require the person to have knowledge to conduct such argument.