Saturday, April 20, 2019
EXAMINING THE U.K EXPERIENCE OF NATIONALIZATION BETWEEN 1946 AND 1986 Essay
EXAMINING THE U.K EXPERIENCE OF NATIONALIZATION BETWEEN 1946 AND 1986 AND INDICATING WHAT FACTORS IGHT BE CONSIDERED AS germane(predicate) WHEN MAKING A DECISION TO NATIO - Essay Example(Cairncross, 1986) The fragmented coal industries were nationalised and so were the railway, steel and telecom industries. Utilities were also nationalised by the Labour government. (Tomlinson, 1982 Durbin, 1985)The ideological priming coat for nationalisation in 1946 U.K. could be summed up in Attlees words a mixed economy developing toward socialism.... The doctrines of abundance, of copious employment, and of social security learn the transfer to prevalent ownership of certain major economic forces and the planned control in the public interest of many other economic activities. (quoted by Yergin and Stanislaw, 1998 p.27)Tomlinson (n.d.) on the other hand views the ideological basis for nationalisation in the UK as reflective of two different epochs the 1930s-1940s reflecting the socialist p lanned economy paradigm, and the 1950s-1970s reflecting a social democratic economic paradigm. Thus, Attlees vision of nationalisation in the UK could be categorised beneath Tomlinsons 1930s-1940s socialist ideological era.It was held that the fragmented nature of privately owned industries (like the coal industry which thence provided about 90 per cent of the UKs energy needs) were inefficient, had experienced under-investment, and lacked scale. (Hannah, 2004) Nationalisation was thus seen as a medium for pulling together resources and implementation of new technologies on a national scale for the mental process of industries. This, it was envisaged, would result in efficient running of industries culminating in the achievement of the national objectives of economic development and growth, full employment, and justice and equality. (Yergin and Stanislaw, 1998 p. 25 Robson, 1962) Nationalisation was thus also a means for salvaging a non-performing and failing private sector so as to harness resources for economic development. It can be argued that nationalisation became a
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment